Tuesday, July 18, 2006

That Was Fast...

I emailed Homes by Avi President Avi Amir on July 10th, and he called me at home the evening of July 11th. It did impress me that he called quickly, despite the fact he was out of town. My impression after the conversation is that he sounds willing to make everything right on my house. But, the reality-check will be on Thursday July 20 when I meet with Mr. Amir and his posse. I guess till then, I would rate everything as guardedly optimistic.

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

When All Else Fails, Go Over Their Heads...

I am not really happy with the amount of time it was taking Homes by Avi to figure how to remediate my house. Like the fact it took one day shy of a month to come up with the four bullet points contained in "The Proposal". A proposal which I would call, lacking. I thought I would climb over Ian Mosher and move up the big guy at Homes by Avi, Avi Amir, President and Founder. I figure he will either jump-start this a bit, or ignore it completely - which I guess would be exactly where I am now...

So after writing and re-writing, well, mostly because in the first version I had kinda let the expletives fly. Not really the most professional way to my arguments across, but it was a more fun to write!!

Monday, July 10, 2006

Honourable Minister Renner Replies

Back on May 29th I wrote an email to the Alberta Minister of Municipal Affairs, the Honourable Rob Renner. He was kind enough to write back.

In his reply he gave me a couple of people to contact, both of whom I have been in contact with already. Both of them have been very polite, and listened to my situation. The Senior Codes and Standards Specialist for Safety Codes Act (SCA) knew his stuff, and was able to point out a few things. Unfortunately the even though the SCA contols the Alberta Building Code the control for the code in Calgary is under the jurisdiction of the City of Calgary.

I cannot stress to everyone out there enough if you are in a similar situation, where a builder or contractor has ignored the Alberta Building Code. Please drop a polite letter off to Hon. Minister Renner. If enough people send in their comments, it is one way to ensure that the building industy is held accountable for their inability to follow the Alberta Building Code, because no Minister is going to ignore a bunch of constituents!

Homes by Avi Presents: The Proposal

Well, they did deliver the project proposal on the date they indicated. Good for them, hopefully Homes by Avi can continue to meet their own deadlines.

Unfortuantely the letter was kind of what I feared in my June 13 post. They have presented a band-aid type of proposal. So lets run through the four project steps they have listed:

A) All required flashings will be installed where missing

So far, so good. This is something that definately needs to be addressed. It brings the lack of flashings on my home up to the Alberta Building code.

B) We will investigate those areas that you have now identified that water has leaked into your home and do everything necessary to fix these problems.

If I read this part correct, they will look around the front window and the back window, but that is it. So what about all the areas where there were no flashings to stop the water from moving behind the battens, stucco and building wrap? What about testing for mould? How can you only look at a couple of areas and not look at the building as whole?

C) In such cases where the color of the stucco repair may not match exactly to the existing, we will recoat the entire wall where the work was completed.

What!?! They are worried that my house looks good cosmetically. But they don't care that there has been no flashings to stop water from entering behind the battens, windows and possibly the home wrap for almost five years. I believe I can characterize this method of making sure everything looks great on the outside but completely ignoring the underlying structure and problems as putting "Lipstick on the Pig".

D) All costs for this work will be borne by Homes by Avi

Now here is a step I can get behind 100%!

Now lets look at what is missing in the Proposal presented to me by Homes by Avi.

  • First, even if they pull off their four listed steps to absolute perfection, I still have a house that does not meet the Alberta Building code. Particularily with regards to the stucco thickness. My house will still have areas that are 67% less than the minimum stucco thickness as prescribed in the Alberta Building Code.
  • Other Building Code issues, like caulking the vertical joints, installing stucco stops were not mentioned.
  • As I talked about above, they are willing to poke around a couple of the windows, to fix the really obvious leaks, but no mention of checking for excessive moisture, mould or any other damages caused by leaks that weren't pouring through my windows.
  • No steps that have them repairing those issues that aren't building code issues, but rather areas where they did not follow the stucco manufacturer's installation guidelines. These would include things like running two layers of building wrap, installing "J-trim", etc.
  • And finally, no third-party inspection process. So lets see they completely messed up the original installation, now they want to come in and fix a bit of the stuff without any kind of third-party review and approval. Come on guys, get with the program here. Third-party review and approval would protect everybody involved now, and in the future, and would finally give my family and I some assurance the the issues have been resolved, and that the house finally meets building code.

Monday, July 03, 2006

Homes by Avi Replies, Finally

Fifteen business days after our last discussion, I got this gem of a letter from Mr. Mosher:

Further to our meeting at your home, this is to advise that we are currently meeting with our sub-contractors to discuss the work that is required to remediate your home. Once this has been completed, we will advise you of our proposal for the work required at your home and a schedule to complete this work. We expect to provide this proposal on or before July 07, 2006.

The letter was dated June 26, 2006; postage meter stamped it June 27, 2006; I received it June 30, 2006.

I am all goose-pimply waiting for the response...